Legal Opinion

McGarry Contracting Co. v. Board of Education of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The provisions of paragraph 4 (d) of the specifications, as we read them, do not unambiguously cover the plaintiff’s claim for the cost of removal of the old foundation walls. The existence of the old walls in the subjacent land was not a “ difference in the character of earth to be excavated ” and it was to “ such differences in subsoil conditions ” that paragraph 4 (d) was addressed. Nor is it clear enough to us that the old walls were “ obstacles to the securing of a good, solid foundation ” in the sense of paragraph 45 (a) of the specifications.

Moreover, article XXX of the contract…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dean v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Novelty Belts Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  2. McGarry Contracting Co. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. Coley v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Pickens v. Cunningham, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1981
  5. Tufano Contracting Corp. v. Port of New York AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API