Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Dixon

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1975No. Crim. No. 25837PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLEMING, Acting P. J.

Rose Dixon, also known as Rose Easley, appeals the judgment (order granting probation) after her conviction for welfare fraud. She was charged with fraud in obtaining aid for her dependent children (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 11483) and in obtaining health care for herself (§ 14014).1 In a nonjury trial she was acquitted on the first charge and convicted on the second.

*433The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the judgment, showed that Dixon separated from her husband and began living with Joseph Easley in 1964 or 1965. Easley fathered her two children, one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. LockettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. People v. SamuelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Abdulshakur v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API