Legal Opinion
Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Aetna Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 1978No. Civ. 41248PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DEVINE, J. *
This appeal presents, according to knowledgeable counsel, a question of first impression about the meaning of Insurance Code section 11580.9, subdivision (d), 1 where an audit, policy is involved. The trial court in the suit for declaratory judgment between insurance companies decided that the policy issued by appellant Aetna Insurance Company described and rated the vehicle involved in the accident and that the policy issued by respondent Ohio Casualty Insurance Company did not describe the vehicle, wherefore the Aetna policy is primary and the Ohio Casualty policy is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Universal Underwriters Insurance v. GewirtzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Pacific Export Packers v. Chubb/Pacific Indemnity GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Argonaut Insurance v. Colonial InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Sequoia InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- HIGHLANDS INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Bohannon v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Grand Rent a Car Corp. v. 20th Century InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.