Infinger v. Edwards
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
These two cases were consolidated at oral arguments for a single determination. Although both cases involve interpretations of the Home Rule Act, 1 the issues presented are otherwise diverse, dictating an independent treatment of each action.
I. Infinger, et al. v. Edwards, et al.
This case arises out of the following stipulated facts. Late in 1975, petitions were first circulated calling for a referendum as to the method of election and form of government for Charleston County pursuant to the Home Rule Act. Section 14-3701 (a), Code of Laws (1975 Cum. Supp.). Thereafter the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Duncan v. County of YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Henderson v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Martin v. EllisorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Neel v. ShealySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Richland County v. Palmetto CablevisionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robinson v. Richland County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Brown v. County of HorrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- City of Myrtle Beach v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Woods v. HamiltonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1979