Legal Opinion

Liebert v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 16, 1957No. 61051; protest 291216-K (Seattle)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The suit listed above challenges the action of the collector of customs in classifying certain imported merchandise as “Machines, N. S. P. F., other (Mink food grinding machines)” and levying duty thereon “under Par. 372, T. A. 1930, as amended” at the rate of 13% percent ad valorem. There was also included in the importation certain spare knives for one of these machines, which were classified as all other cutting knives used in a power machine, and duty was levied thereon at the rate of 10 percent ad valorem under paragraph 356 of said act, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pacific Guano & Fertilizer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Liebert v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API