Legal Opinion

Rosette Incorporated v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 22, 2002No. 00-2453PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Rosette Incorporated, et al. (Rosette), appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States as to the ownership of geothermal resources on property obtained pursuant to patents issued under the Stock Raising Homestead Act of 1916 (SRHA), 43 U.S.C. § 291 et seq.; 42 Stat. 1445 (repealed 1976); 39 Stat. 862-64, 65 (repealed 1976). We affirm, agreeing with the district court that the geothermal resources at issue in this case are “minerals” within the reservation of the patents.

I

Rosette is a collection of related corporations…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Andrus v. Charlestone Stone Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Watt v. Western Nuclear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Shiver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Rogelio Saenz-MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  2. Rosette, Inc. v. United States of Department of the InteriorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Ambort v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. Alba v. Peoples Energy Resources Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. City of Kenai v. Cook Inlet Natural Gas Storage Alaska, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API