McCarty v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for prostitution. Punishment was assessed at 90 days.
In her first two grounds of error appellant challenges the constitutionality of the prostitution statute. V.T.C.A., Penal Code Sec. 43.02(a)(1) provides:
“(a) A person commits an offense if he knowingly:
“(1) offers to engage, agrees to engage, or engages in sexual conduct for a fee;”
Appellant argues the term “offer” is unconstitutionally vague. New York has a similar prostitution statute, McKinney’s Penal Law, Sec. 230.00, which provides:
“A person is guilty of prostitution when such…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Austin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Ozack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Frieling v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
- Schneider v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
- Young Sun Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.