Enamorado v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
The defendants Maximo Enamorado and Jose Sada were convicted of dealing in cocaine and conspiracy to commit dealing in cocaine, both class A felonies, and lesser felonies for violations of the Indiana Controlled Substances Act. The court reduced the presumptive sentence of thirty years for each of Enamorado’s class A felonies to twenty-four years and ordered that they be served concurrently. Sada received concurrent thirty year sentences.
Each defendant has brought a direct appeal which we shall address in this opinion, regrouping defendants’ challenges as follows:
1.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- Case v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Randall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Stark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Newland McElfresh v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Penick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- O'NEILL v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Sada v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Valle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.