Legal Opinion

Enamorado v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1989No. 49S00-8607-CR-00694PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

The defendants Maximo Enamorado and Jose Sada were convicted of dealing in cocaine and conspiracy to commit dealing in cocaine, both class A felonies, and lesser felonies for violations of the Indiana Controlled Substances Act. The court reduced the presumptive sentence of thirty years for each of Enamorado’s class A felonies to twenty-four years and ordered that they be served concurrently. Sada received concurrent thirty year sentences.

Each defendant has brought a direct appeal which we shall address in this opinion, regrouping defendants’ challenges as follows:

1.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Case v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Randall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Stark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Newland McElfresh v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Penick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. O'NEILL v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Sada v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Valle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API