Legal Opinion

Newland McElfresh v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2016No. 32S01-1511-CR-667PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID, Justice.

While Newland McElfresh was in jail awaiting his guilty plea hearing, he wrote an intimidating and coercive letter to the mother of the child victim who was the subject of the child molestation charges McElfresh was intending to plead guilty to. The letter and the surrounding circumstances provided sufficient evidence to support a conviction for attempted ob struction of justice. A reasonable trier of fact could have concluded that McElfresh’s intent in sending the letter was an attempt to influence the child into changing her prior allegations against him before the court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Cotto v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State of Indiana v. Robert CollierIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Steven Clippinger v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  3. James R. Eisert v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Shawn P. Morrell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Katherine Shuwan Holmes v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API