Legal Opinion

Wright v. United States

District Court, D. Montana

Decided January 24, 1977No. CV-74-92-HGPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BATTIN, District Judge.

Presently pending before the Court are the respective motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiffs and the defendant. The matter has been fully briefed by counsel for both parties; no hearing having been requested, the matter is deemed to be submitted on the briefs. Summary judgment is granted in favor of the defendant United States against the plaintiffs. Summary judgment is denied on the motion filed by the plaintiffs against the defendant.

Summary judgment, as authorized by Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is a method for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Logue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Maryland Ex Rel. Levin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Willie B. Vincent v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mendrala v. Crown Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Ferguson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1989
  3. Mendrala v. Crown Mortgage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API