Legal Opinion

United States v. Airrington Sykes

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 30, 2019No. 17-3221PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

After the government indicted Airrington Sykes for being a felon in possession of a firearm, see 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1), he moved to suppress evidence that a police officer obtained after he stopped Sykes and frisked him. When the district court 1 denied the motion, Sykes pleaded guilty to the charge but reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion. He appeals and we affirm.

On a December evening just shy of midnight, a police officer in Waterloo, Iowa, was dispatched to a 24-hour laundromat where he met a woman in the parking lot who reported finding a loaded…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. County of Los Angeles v. MendezSupreme Court of the United States · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kevin Chestnut v. Officer Dawain WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  2. Gabriel Garcia-Hernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Ricky PulleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  5. Clark v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API