State ex rel. Van de Kerkhoff v. Dowling
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
For a writ of mandamus to issue, relators must first show that they are entitled to respondents’ performance of a clear legal duty. State, ex rel. The Fairfield Leader, v. Ricketts (1990), 56 Ohio St.3d 97, 102, 564 N.E.2d 486, 491. To establish a duty for respondents to accept and determine the sufficiency of their part-petitions, as supplemented, relators rely on the Lakewood Charter, principles of estoppel and the doctrine of substantial compliance. We find relators’ reliance misplaced and, therefore, deny the writ.
*57 The Charter
Relators argue that they are entitled to supplement their…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State ex rel. Fairfield Leader v. RickettsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Senn v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Chevalier v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State ex rel. Evergreen Co. v. Board of Elections of Franklin CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State ex rel. Janasik v. SarosyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Ditmars v. McSweeneyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Yiamouyiannis v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Shaw v. LynchOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Ditmars v. McSweeneyOhio Supreme Court · 2002