Legal Opinion

Stachon v. Orville Hoxie & Haviland Products Co.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided December 31, 1960No. Civ. A. 3531PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STARR, Chief Judge.

On May 18, 1960, the defendants filed objections to the taxing of court costs in plaintiff’s favor. They base their objections to the plaintiff’s bill of costs on the grounds: (1) That he recovered a verdict of less than $10,000; (2) that the court has not entered an order authorizing him to tax costs against the defendants; and (3) that the expense of taking the deposition of Dr. Mulder and the expense for a map and for photographs are not properly taxable as costs.

The court will first consider the question of whether the plaintiff should be permitted to tax any court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Perlman v. FeldmannDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
  3. Bank of America v. Loew's International CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  4. Hope Basket Co. v. Product Advancement Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
  5. Hansen v. BradleyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dr. Franklin Perkins School v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Dowdell v. City of Apopka, Fla.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1981
  3. Cox v. MadduxDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1968
  4. Soo Hardwoods, Inc. v. Universal Oil Products Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
  5. Kinsey v. WeatherlyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API