Legal Opinion

Mattern v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 26, 1991No. 3—90—0769WCPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stouder

The petitioner, David J. Mattem, appeals the Industrial Commission’s (Commission’s) dismissal of his petition for review. The relevant facts are not in dispute. The petitioner initially filed a compensation claim against the respondent, Rowe Construction Company. The record does not disclose the nature of the claim or the arbitrator’s decision. The petitioner received a copy of the arbitrator’s decision on June 27, 1988. On July 5, 1988, he mailed a petition for review to the Commission. On the same date, he mailed a copy of the petition to the respondent’s attorney, who received it the next…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. General American Life Insurance v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Northwestern Steel & Wire Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Wiscons v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eschbaugh v. Industrial Com'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. Salisbury v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  3. Eschbaugh v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Lee v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API