Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lee v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 13, 1994No. 1—93—0803WCPublished

1DissentJustice Rarick

I respectfully dissent.

While I agree with the majority with respect to when the accident occurred, I believe that the better view, as espoused by Professor Larson, is that injuries sustained while traveling to and from medical treatment for a compensable injury arise out of and in the course of employment and are compensable. As Professor Larson points out, when referring to Taylor, an employer is under a statutory duty to furnish medical care, and an employee is under a statutory duty to submit to reasonable medical treatment. Such duties become, by implication, part of the employment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Komatsu Dresser Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Humphrey v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Mattern v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API