Legal Opinion

Boland v. Jando

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 8, 1965No. 51534PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Commissioner.

John A. Boland sued Ferenc Jando for $35,000 damages for personal injury and injury to his automobile alleged to arise from a rear-end collision between their automobiles. A jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, Boland, for $500 personal injuries and $200 property damage, and he has appealed on the ground, inter alia, that by reason of inadequacy of the verdict he is entitled to a new trial. The amount in dispute is the difference between the $35,-000 claimed and the $700 received, and jurisdiction is thus in this court. Mo.Const., Art. V, § 3, V.A.M.S.; Section 477.040…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allen v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Artstein Ex Rel. Artstein v. Pallo Ex Rel. PalloSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Boring v. Kansas City Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  4. Davidson v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Spica v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sampson v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. Homeyer v. Wyandotte Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Asbridge v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Sigrist by and Through Sigrist v. ClarkeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API