Legal Opinion

Oklahoma State Bank of Cushing v. Buzzard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 24, 1918No. 9300PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Garfield County; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by F. B. Buzzard against the Oklahoma State Bank of Cushing and E. H. Howell. Judgment for plaintiff, motion for new trial overruled, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DAVIS, C.

The instant case is an appeal from a judgment and decree of the district court of Garfield county, Okla., in favor of the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, and against the plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as defendants, for the sum of $1,188.75 and all costs or said action.

The transactions out of which this litigation grows are as follows; On 'the 23rd day of October, 1913, the plaintiff entered into a written .contract with the Jones Oil & Gas Company, a corporation, A. E. Mas-cho, Milton Thompson, and E. A. Smith, designated as parties…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullen v. ThaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Morrison v. Wisconsin Odd Fellows' Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Williams v. Kelsey & HalstedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  4. Frick v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  5. City of Anadarko v. ArgoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sealey v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Green v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. M. E. Trapp, Associated v. TankersleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Pierce Petroleum Corp. v. Osage Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API