Legal Opinion
Dore v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 1, 1951No. 48682, 48683PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
Plaintiffs were millers of rice during the period of commodity price control during World War II. In these suits they seek to recover just compensation for an alleged taking of rice, within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment, through compulsory-compliance with Government set-aside orders and forced sale to the Government at certain controlled prices, which so-called sales resulted in losses to plaintiffs.
Rice milling involves the purchase of rough, raw rice; the cleaning, polishing and preparation of that rice for sale; and the distribution into wholesale -channels of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Thomas F. Lee and Wife Ola Mae Lee, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- American-Hawaiian Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Fleming v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Azul Pacifico, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1990
- United States v. 45,131.44 Acres Of Land, More Or Less, In El Paso, Fremont And Pueblo Counties, State Of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.