Legal Opinion

Brown v. Pfeiffer

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided October 20, 2020No. 0:19-cv-03132Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Shatara Brown, Nikoe Lee, and Colleana Case No. 19-cv-3132 (WMW/KMM) Young, Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT v. MICHAEL FRUEN’S MOTION TO DISMISS Reese Pfeiffer, Fruen & Pfeiffer LLP, Michael Fruen, and M Fruen Properties LLC, Defendants. Before the Court is Defendant Michael Fruen’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint, as asserted against Fruen individually, for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Dkt. 91.) For the reasons addressed below, Fruen’s motion to dismiss is granted. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. Meyer v. HolleySupreme Court of the United States · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API