Johnson v. Darchuks Fabrication, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
CHUTICH, Justice.
This case considers whether the medical treatment parameters established under the workers' compensation act apply to an employee's claim for reimbursement of medical expenses that the employer contends are not reasonably necessary. Minnesota Rule 5221.6020, subpart 2 (2017), states that the treatment parameters "do not apply to treatment of an injury after an insurer has denied liability for the injury." Relying on this rule, the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals concluded that the treatment parameters do not apply when an employer contests its obligation under the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. FleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Schmidt ex rel. P.M.S. v. CoonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Jacka v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Pelowski v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- County of Hennepin v. MikulaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeal by Nobility Home Health Care, Inc. A21-1477, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeal by Nobility Home Health Care, Inc. A21-1477, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeal by Nobility Home Health Care, Inc. A21-1477, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeal by Nobility Home Health Care, Inc. A21-1477, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeal by Nobility Home Health Care, Inc. A21-1477, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.