Legal Opinion

State v. Green

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 1, 1911No. 7933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before MemmingEr, J., Sumter, July term, 1910. Indictment against Lloyd Green and Anna Henderson. Defendant, Green, appeals. cites: As to construction of dispensary lazv: 63 S. C. 98.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion- of the Court was delivered; by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

The appellant was convicted on an indictment charging that he “did unlawfully accept, receive, store and keep in possession” alcoholic liquors contrary to the statute. He admitted having liquor in his possession, but claimed that he had it only for his- own personal use. He requested the Court to charge the jury that the term “storing and keeping in possession” used in the statute involves the idea of continuity or habit. The Court charged that that was correct under the old dispensary law, when the State engaged in the sale of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Easley Town Council v. PeggSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Burns Et Ux.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  2. State v. HarleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  3. State v. BradleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  4. State v. Burns Et Ux.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  5. State v. GoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API