Legal Opinion

Bonaparte v. Camden & A. R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided October 15, 1830PublishedCited by 20 opinions

In equity on a motion for an injunction on bill and answer. The bill set forth that the complainant [Joseph Bonaparte] was an alien, that in virtue of a special law of New Jersey, he was enabled to hold land in the state, and had purchased two thousand acres of land adjoining Bordentown, whereon he had made extensive and valuable improvements, at an expense of three hundred thousand dollars, and where he had resided for many years.

Read the full summary

In equity on a motion for an injunction on bill and answer. The bill set forth that the complainant [Joseph Bonaparte] was an alien, that in virtue of a special law of New Jersey, he was enabled to hold land in the state, and had purchased two thousand acres of land adjoining Bordentown, whereon he had made extensive and valuable improvements, at an expense of three hundred thousand dollars, and where he had resided for many years. That the improvements consist of valuable buildings, a park, pleasure grounds, embankments, roads, walks, a lake, gardens, and other works combining utility with…

1Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, Circuit Justice.

The eleventh section of the judiciary act gives jurisdiction to this court, in all cases of a civil nature at common law or in equity. 1 Story [Laws] 57 [Act Sept. 24,1789; 1 Stat. 78]. The complainant has therefore a right to sue here, independently of any state law. It attaches to his character of an alien, which is admitted in this case, and as he holds his land by the law of this state, it matters not whether it is a general or special one, his right of property gives him the same remedy for its violation, as to an alien residing abroad or a citizen of another…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jerome v. RossNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
  2. Hendricks v. RobinsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
  3. Rogers v. BradshawCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1823
  4. Corning v. LowerreNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  5. Hooker v. CummingsNew York Supreme Court · 1822

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Delaware State Sportsmens Association Inc v. Delaware Department of Safety and Homeland SecuritCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  3. Weirich v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  4. County of Kane v. Elmhurst National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Klemic v. Dominion Transmission, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API