Legal Opinion

Rios v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 22, 2001No. 84-672; A104844PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB), upon remand to the Board from the Supreme Court, Rios v. PSRB, 325 Or 151, 934 P2d 399 (1997), that continued petitioner’s commitment at a state hospital. See ORS 161.341. We write only to address petitioner’s contention that an Axis I diagnosis of pedophilia or of alcohol abuse cannot constitute a “mental disease or defect” for purposes of ORS 161.341(4), in that those conditions are excluded by ORS 161.295(2)1 We reject that argument for the reasons stated in the en banc lead opinion in Hanson v. PSRB, 156…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanson v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Hanson v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Rios v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rios v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API