Forest Home Dodge, Inc. v. Karns
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
“Qui facit per alium facit per se.”
Broom’s Legal Maxims, p. 689 London, 1911
This being an appeal from the decision of an administrative agency, the courts are governed by the provisions of sec. 227.20, Stats. That portion of the statutes allows a decision to be reversed or modified if the appellant is prejudiced as the result of the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions, being unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole. The same statute also directs the courts to accord due weight to the experience, technical competence, and specialized…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- American Federation of Labor v. American Sash & Door Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Keokee Consolidated Coke Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- New Motor Vehicle Bd. of Cal. v. Orrin W. Fox Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ford Motor Co. v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. State Division of Hearings & AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Harvey v. MorganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Benson & Gold Chev. v. La. Motor Veh. Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.