Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. Trout

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1918No. 2-2545PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Seventh Supreme Judicial District. Suit by H. P. Trout against the Chicago, Bock Island & Gulf Railway Company and others. From judgment for plaintiff, defendants appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals, which affirmed (152 S. W. 1137), and defendants bring error.

Read the full summary

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Seventh Supreme Judicial District. Suit by H. P. Trout against the Chicago, Bock Island & Gulf Railway Company and others. From judgment for plaintiff, defendants appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals, which affirmed (152 S. W. 1137), and defendants bring error. Defendant in error brought this suit to recover damages against the Chicago, Bock Island & Gulf Bailway Company and the Chicago, Bock Island & El Paso Railway Company as partners on account of an injury sustained by defendant on May 6, 19-10, on a freight train on a line of railway froth Tucumcari,…

1Opinion of the CourtSadler, J.

(after stating the facts as above). [1] The first assignment of error complains of the action of the court in refusing to strike out the trial amendment *830and in overruling the application for a continuance. There was no reversible error in this, since the issue presented by the trial amendment was not submitted in the court’s charge.

[2] Plaintiffs in error complain of the charge of the court in submitting to the jury the question of partnership, complain that the evidence was insufficient to show partnership and to sustain the verdict and judgment. The evidence is insufficient to establish…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Buie v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904
  4. Robinson & Watson v. WingateTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. TroutCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API