Legal Opinion
Herrin v. Federal Aviation Administration
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided April 12, 1976No. Civ. 75-0415-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
In this action Plaintiff seeks reversal of a Civil Service Commission (CSC) Order affirming a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) decision denying Plaintiff’s application to have his job classification upgraded to GS-12 from GS-11.
Defendants object to the Court’s jurisdiction. However, it appears that jurisdiction is proper under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq. 1 The APA provides for judicial review of certain agency actions. 5 U.S.C. § 702 reads:
“A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State Highway Commission of Missouri v. VolpeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Milo Burroughs v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- BANKING BD. OF STATE OF OKL. v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989