Legal Opinion

State v. Murphy

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 2006No. 9-06-24PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Heidi Murphy, appeals from the May 8, 2006 judgment of the Marion Municipal Court, Marion County, Ohio, finding her guilty of one count of failure to confine a vicious dog and two counts of failure to obtain liability insurance, all in violation of R.C. 955.22.

{¶ 2} These charges stem from events occurring on October 28, 2005, in Marion, Ohio. On this date, Jeremy Roberts, a Deputy Dog Warden for Marion County, responded to a call concerning a pit bull that was seen running loose in the general area of Murphy’s home. Roberts saw a man, later identified…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. MattisonOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State v. CowanOhio Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Smith, 1-07-67 (4-21-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API