Legal Opinion

Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1998No. 96-6087, 96-6145Published

1Opinion of the Court

145 F.3d 1159

76 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1865, 66 USLW 2780

Maudie BEAIRD, Mildred Bobo, Jerlene Bush, Rosa Clark,

William Henson, Claudia Johnson, Margaret Jones,

Ruth Noran, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

and

Marjie Ferguson, Leonard Flannery, Thomas Fung, Gerald

Lecompte, Shirley McCartney, Dianna G. Woods, Plaintiffs,

v.

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 96-6087, 96-6145.

United States Court of Appeals,

Tenth Circuit.

May 28, 1998.

Mark Hammons, Hammons & Associates, Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Gary C. Pierson (Tony G. Puckett and Mark D. Spencer with him on briefs), Lytle…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API