Legal Opinion

McBroom v. Ethicon Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 6, 2022No. 2:20-cv-02127Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 No. CV-20-02127-PHX-DGC 9 Amanda McBroom, 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Ethicon, Inc.; and Johnson & Johnson, 13 Defendants. 14 15 This products liability action involves pelvic mesh devices made by Defendants 16 Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. Plaintiff Amanda McBroom received implants of 17 Defendants’ devices and claims they are defective and caused her serious injury. Plaintiff 18 filed this suit in 2015 as part of a multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) proceeding in West 19 Virginia. Doc. 1; see In re…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  2. Dart v. Wiebe Manufacturing, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Byrns v. Riddell, IncorporatedArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Golonka v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  5. Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API