Legal Opinion

Ethel Kravitz v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, United States of America Ex Rel. Kravitz, Ethel v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Nos. 76-1390, 76-1599

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 23, 1977No. 1100Published

1Opinion of the Court

546 F.2d 1100

Ethel KRAVITZ, Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al., Appellees.

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. KRAVITZ, Ethel, Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al., Appellees.

Nos. 76-1390, 76-1599.

United States Court of Appeals,

Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 19, 1976.

Decided Feb. 23, 1977.

1

Harold Cramer, Mesirov, Gelman, Jaffe and Cramer, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant in Nos. 76-1390, 76-1599; Ralph S. Spritzer, Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel.

2

Maria Parisi Vickers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Michael von Moschzisker, Deputy Atty.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API