Webb v. Gee
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
YARRUT, Judge.
Plaintiff sues to recover double her 10% deposit, plus 25% attorney’s fees, and interest, alleging the failure of the vendors to deliver title pursuant to an executory agreement of sale of an immovable.
Defendants are the two vendors and the corporate real estate broker. The 10% deposit was made to the broker and, following suit, was deposited in the Registry of the Court.
Defendants charge that the default was due to plaintiff, and denied plaintiff was entitled to the return of her deposit, and defendant-broker reconvened fo.r its 6% commission. The Trial Court held that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jaenke v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Leaman v. RauschkolbLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Probst v. Di GiovanniSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- Lomel Realty Corporation v. ChopinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Cox v. GreenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Papa v. Louisiana Metal Awning CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961