Legal Opinion

Ex parte Barclay

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine

Decided May 29, 1907No. 50PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner was tried and convicted in this court under section 3062 of the Revised Statutes [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2007]. The only penalty imposed for the offense is a fine of not more than $1,000 nor less than $50. No penalty of imprisonment is provided. The sentence imposed, or the order incorporated therewith, directed in the usual form that, in default of payment of the fine, Barclay should stand committed to jail until the fine should be paid or he should be otherwise discharged according to law. *670The mittimus or warrant followed the sentence in this respect.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hill v. United States Ex Rel. WamplerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Wagner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  3. Peeples v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Green v. PeakCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  5. Dodd v. PeakCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API