In re Richards
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD, J.
At petitioner’s 1997 trial for the murder of his wife, the evidence against him was circumstantial. One of many pieces of evidence linking petitioner to the crime was a postmortem photograph of the victim’s hand, depicting an indistinct, crescent-shaped lesion. The prosecution’s dental expert stated his opinion that the lesion was a human bite mark. And after comparing the bite mark to the distinctive arrangement of petitioner’s lower teeth, the dental expert stated that petitioner’s unusual dentition was consistent with the shape of the mark depicted in the photograph, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Darrel Peter PandeliArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- William Richards v. County of San BernardinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- In re HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Engesser v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- In re Rigsby, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.