Larimer County Canal No. 2 Irrigating Co. v. Poudre Valley Reservoir Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from Larimer District Court. Honorable James E. Gtarrigues, Judge. Oh rehearing:
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
The appellees filed their petition in the district court, under the act of 1903 (Session Laws 1903, p. 278), praying for an order allowing them to change the place of diversion of certain rights, claimed to belong to them, in the decreed priorities of what was called the Canon Canal Company’s ditch, from the'headgate of that ditch to the headgate of the Poudre Valley canal, owned by petitioners, both of those ditches taking water from the same river. The Canon Canal Company’s ditch, or Canon canal, as it is usually designated in the record of the present proceeding, was designated as No. 20,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- New Mercer Ditch Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Vogel v. Minnesota Canal & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Cache La Poudre Irrigating Co. v. Larimer & Weld Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898
- New Cache la Poudre Irrigation Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Wadsworth Ditch Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Colorado Springs v. YustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Conrow v. HuffineMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Fort Collins Milling & Elevator Co. v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- New Cache la Poudre Irrigating Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Dry Creek No. 2 Ditch Co. v. Coal Ridge Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.