Ex Parte Liddon
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtPoster, J.
After the probate of a will in the probate court, a contest was filed in the chancery court by an heir of decedent, and, before it was heard, the contestant died. The question is whether the proceeding could be revived. We have never had the exact question in this court. It is now well settled that such a “cause of action” does not survive. If it was not begun in the lifetime of the contestant, it eannot.be begun by his representative after his death. Allen v. Pugh, 206 Ala. 10, 89 So. 470; Cain v. Burger, 219 Ala. 10, 121 So. 17.
With reference to actions pending at law, if based upon…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Doe ex dem Duval's heirs v. McLoskeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
- In Re Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Wynn v. Tallapoosa County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Selden v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Allen v. PughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Griffin v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Campbell v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- McAdory v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Heartsill v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Webb v. FrenchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.