Karnal v. Horovitz

In this action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the corporate defendant moves to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the alleged contract is unenforcible under the Statute of Frauds.

The complaint sets forth two causes of action: the first against the defendant Horovitz, and the second against the corporate defendant. The first cause of action having been dismissed (see Karnal v. Horovitz, N. Y. L. J., Aug. 19,1946, p. 289, col. 1), • there remains for consideration the second cause of action. This cause of action alleges that the defendant corporation…