Wattles v. Plotts
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
POLLOCK, J.
Twenty-six years ago we condemned the business of “heir hunting” as having “no social value.” Bron v. Weintraub, 42 N.J. 87, 95, 199 A. 2d 625 (1964). The Legislature has since characterized heir hunting as a “questionable scheme” operated by “intermeddlers,” an “iniquitous practice,” and as a “ ‘racket.’ ” See infra at 450-451, 577 A.2d at 135-136; Statement Accompanying Sen. No. 291, L.1967, c. 149. This case presents a variation on the Bron theme.
Plaintiff, Gordon Wattles, instituted an action to foreclose a tax-sale certificate on a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bron v. WeintraubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Walter v. SandsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Wattles v. PlottsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
3Cited by14 opinions
- Simon v. CroneckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Town of Phillipsburg v. BlockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Simon v. RandoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Simon v. RandoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Del Vecchio v. HembergerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.