Legal Opinion

Wattles v. Plotts

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 25, 1990PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

Twenty-six years ago we condemned the business of “heir hunting” as having “no social value.” Bron v. Weintraub, 42 N.J. 87, 95, 199 A. 2d 625 (1964). The Legislature has since characterized heir hunting as a “questionable scheme” operated by “intermeddlers,” an “iniquitous practice,” and as a “ ‘racket.’ ” See infra at 450-451, 577 A.2d at 135-136; Statement Accompanying Sen. No. 291, L.1967, c. 149. This case presents a variation on the Bron theme.

Plaintiff, Gordon Wattles, instituted an action to foreclose a tax-sale certificate on a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bron v. WeintraubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Walter v. SandsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  3. Wattles v. PlottsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Simon v. CroneckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  2. Town of Phillipsburg v. BlockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  3. Simon v. RandoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  4. Simon v. RandoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  5. Del Vecchio v. HembergerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API