Legal Opinion

Simon v. Rando

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 29, 2007PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin

In Simon v. Cronecker, 189 N.J. 304, 915 A.2d 489, 2007 WL 208520 (2007), decided today, we held that “the Tax Sale Law does not prohibit a third-party investor from redeeming a tax sale certificate after the filing of a foreclosure action, provided that the investor timely intervenes in the action and pays the property owner more than nominal consideration for the property.” Id. at 311, 915 A.2d at 493. Thus, in the post-foreclosure complaint period, unless the third-party investor who acquires an interest in the subject property first receives court approval, the investor has no right to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brunswick Hills Racquet Club, Inc. v. Route 18 Shopping Center AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Simon v. CroneckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  3. Simon v. RandoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  4. Wattles v. PlottsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Simon v. CroneckerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  2. GGI Properties, LLC v. City of Millville (In re GGI Properties, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
  3. Malinowski v. JacobsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  4. In Re Princeton Office Park v. Plymouth Park Tax Services (069521)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  5. Phoenix Funding, Inc. v. KruteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API