Legal Opinion
Davis v. Astrue
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 13, 2012No. Nos. C-06-6108 EMC, C-09-0980 EMCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have sued the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”), asserting claims for violation of the Rehabilitation Act. According to Plaintiffs, SSA has violated the Rehabilitation Act by failing to make the work reviews under Title II and Title XVI accessible to individuals with mental or developmental disabilities. See Docket No. 162 (Pis.’ Mot. for Summ. Judg. (“MSJ”) at 2)1. Currently pending before the Court is the SSA’s motion for summary judgment. In the motion, SSA argues that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ricketson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2017
- Larson v. Trans Union, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Murphy v. Automated Accounts IncDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021
- Tyler Maghoney, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Dotdash Meredith, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2026