Legal Opinion

Gorman v. McFarland

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1854PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Washington.

1Opinion of the CourtLipscomb, J.

The record shows that a trial in the Court below was had anda verdict rendered for the defendant, upon which a formal judgment was rendered. A new trial was asked for and granted, upon condition that the plaintiff should pay the costs, on or before the next Term. At the next Term the cost was paid, and the cause continued on the docket some*238thing like two years, until the Spring Term, 1853. In the mean time the original defendant, Saunders, departed this life, and the suit was revived in the name of Ms administrator, the present defendant, and other orders were made as if the case was still…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. DickmanTexas Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Town v. GuerguinTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Fenn v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API