City of San Antonio v. Dickman
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before the Hon. George H. Noonan. The opinion states the case. After its rendition, counsel for the appellee applied for a rehearing, and cited sundry authorities pertinent to the important questions of practice presented by the case.
1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.
Judgment by default with a writ of inquiry was entered in this cause in 1858, and the cause was then continued from term to term for several' years, not specifically indicated by the record, when a jury was empanneled, and the cause Was submitted to the jury under the charge of the court, and a verdict and judgment were rendered.
*650It may be presumed that this judgment was rendered at the spring term, 1868, notwithstanding, through the great carelessness of the cleric, it bears no date; as at that time a motion for a new trial was sustained, without any question being raised as to the motion not…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gorman v. McFarlandTexas Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jordan v. Bustamante, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Consolidated Underwriters v. McCauleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Schintz v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Brannon v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Ebaugh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.