Legal Opinion

Vincent DiVito, Inc. v. Vollmar Clay Products Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 3, 1989No. 87-3286PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Coccia

Plaintiff, Vincent DiVito, Inc., appeals from: (1) the denial of its motion for summary judgment on a cause of action seeking promissory estoppel; (2) the granting of defendant Vollmar Clay Products Company’s cross-motion for summary judgment on DiVito’s promissory estoppel cause of action; and (3) the granting of Vollmar’s cross-motion for summary judgment on DiVito’s cause of action for breach of contract.

We affirm the denial of DiVito’s motion seeking summary judgment on its promissory estoppel count; reverse the entry of summary judgment in Vollmar’s favor on DiVito’s promissory estoppel…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kolakowski v. VorisIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bank of Marion v. Robert" Chick" Fritz, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. McCarty v. Verson Allsteel Press Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. S. N. Nielsen Co. v. National Heat & Power Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Illinois Valley Asphalt, Inc. v. J. F. Edwards Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Quake Construction, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Architectural Metal Systems, Incorporated v. Consolidated Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. A-Abart Electric Supply, Incorporated v. Emerson Electric Company and Littman Brothers Energy Supplies, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Caponi v. Larry's 66Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Ilan Geva v. Leo Burnett Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API