Legal Opinion

Dixie Insurance v. Quesenberry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 8, 1990No. 16-89-00380; CA A61783PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

In this declaratory judgment action, defendant Krantz appeals and assigns error to the trial court’s grant of a summary judgment for plaintiff (Dixie). We affirm.

On April 29, 1988, Dixie issued a motor vehicle liability policy to defendant Quesenberry that provided coverage while he operated “[a]ny non-owned private passenger, utility car or utility trailer.” (Emphasis supplied.) In early July, 1988, Quesenberry purchased a car. Approximately five or six weeks later, on August 20, 1988, while driving the new car, he was involved in an accident with two other vehicles. A passenger in one of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Viking Insurance v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ohm v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Viking Insurance v. PerottiOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Farmers Insurance Company v. StoutCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. VIKING INS. CO. OF WIS. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United Services Automobile Assn. v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API