Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 1, 1927No. 1453PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant, while in the discharge of his duties to appellee as freight conductor, received the injuries forming the basis of this suit. We quote as follows from his petition:

"Plaintiff alleges that all of his injuries and damage sustained directly and proximately resulted from one or more of the following acts of negligence, operating either singly or concurrently, to wit:
"(a) The defendant, the Houston East West Texas Railway Company, was negligent in failing to exercise ordinary care and prudence to provide the plaintiff a reasonably safe place and premises on which to perform his services…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hugo, Schmeltzer Company v. PaizTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Lantry-Sharpe Contracting Co. v. McCrackenTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. FenwickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Memphis Cotton Oil Co. v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Pacific Express Co. v. ShiversCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gerneth v. Galbraith-Foxworth Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co. v. JacksonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Gerneth v. Galbraith-Foxworth Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API