Legal Opinion

Ridenour v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 11, 1956No. 44903PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOHLING, Commissioner.

Hazel Duncan Ridenour, Joyce Snyder , , _ , g; , L , and Raymond Duncan sued Robert Earl Duncan and Florence Duncan, husband and wife, and Eliza W. Herod and Elmer J. Fults to cancel certain deeds conveying the property commonly known as 907 Prospect avenue, Kansas City, Missouri-, a five-apartment building, and all the furniture and furnishings therein, and a deed of trust thereon, and asked, claiming an undivided one-half interest therein, title be decreed and for general .equitable relief. A prior appeal, affirming an order granting plain tiffs a new trial, is…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Berghorn v. Reorganized School District No. 8Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Pulitzer v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. Turner v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Conrad v. Diehl.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. Rains v. MoulderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hahn v. HahnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Wilkie v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Groh v. SheltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Robb v. N. W. Electric Power CooperativeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. Sando v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API