Legal Opinion
X One, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 6, 2017No. Case No. 16-CV-06050-LHKPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. No. 24
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Plaintiff X One, Inc. (“X One” or “Plaintiff’) filed a patent infringement suit against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber” or “Defendant”) and alleged that Defendant infringed the claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,798,647 and 8,798,593. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 24 (“Mot.”). Having considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion to…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Javiad Akhtar v. J. MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Location Based Servs., LLC v. Niantic, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Lazer IP LLC v. Microchip Technology IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022
- Repifi Vendor Logistics, Inc. v. Intellicentrics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2021