Stoneman v. . Erie Railway Company

From the facts found by the judge at the trial, it appears that the articles for which this action is brought were chiefly owned by the plaintiff prior to her marriage in 1861, or were the proceeds of that property, except the presents made to plaintiff at the time of her marriage and prior thereto, or possibly some of it (how much, if any, except the rattle and cup, does not appear) afterward.

It further appears that, at and from the time of said marriage to the trial, the State of Maryland had been the matrimonial domicile of the plaintiff, and that, by the laws of that State at and since…