Legal Opinion

Vernon v. Drexel Burnham & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 23, 1975No. Civ. 45592PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON, J.

The Case

On November. 19, 1973, Attorneys Richard P. Rich and Mitchel J. Ezer “on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated,” as plaintiffs and attorneys of record for plaintiff-respondent, filed an action entitled, “Complaint Class Action for Fraud and Deceit; Money Had and Received; Usury” (superior court case No. CA-000084). Named as one of the defendants was Drexel Burnham & Co., Incorporated, formerly known as Burnham & Co., Inc., a corporation, appellant herein (hereinafter Drexel Burnham), along with 24 other corporations and 500 Does. The action…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Utah Construction Co. v. Western Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Frame v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Ware v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Wisconsin Auto Title Loans, Inc. v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Izzi v. Mesquite Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API