Legal Opinion

Riley v. Segan, Nemerov & Singer, P.C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 22, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Supreme Court denied defendants’ motion based on its finding that the moving papers were deficient because a March 7, 2005 letter referenced therein was not attached. We find that Supreme Court should have considered the motion on the merits because it is clear that defendants mistakenly failed to attach the letter to their moving papers but corrected their mistake by including it on reply. Flaintiffs were not prejudiced in any way because they actually received the letter as an exhibit with their copy of the moving papers and so were able to address the letter in their opposition (see Matter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Kennelly v. Mobius Realty Holdings LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schwenger v. Weitz, Kleinick & Weitz, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. Schwenger v. Weitz, Kleinick & Weitz, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. Payson v. 50 Sutton Place South Owners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Payson v. 50 Sutton Place South Owners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API