Riley v. Segan, Nemerov & Singer, P.C.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Supreme Court denied defendants’ motion based on its finding that the moving papers were deficient because a March 7, 2005 letter referenced therein was not attached. We find that Supreme Court should have considered the motion on the merits because it is clear that defendants mistakenly failed to attach the letter to their moving papers but corrected their mistake by including it on reply. Flaintiffs were not prejudiced in any way because they actually received the letter as an exhibit with their copy of the moving papers and so were able to address the letter in their opposition (see Matter…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Kennelly v. Mobius Realty Holdings LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schwenger v. Weitz, Kleinick & Weitz, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Schwenger v. Weitz, Kleinick & Weitz, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Payson v. 50 Sutton Place South Owners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Payson v. 50 Sutton Place South Owners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013