Legal Opinion
Newburgh Moire Co. v. Superior Moire Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 5, 1952No. Civ. A. 626-51PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MODARELLI, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed this action to enjoin alleged infringement by defendant of two patents for producing moire pattern effects in fabrics. The patents were issued in ,1948 and 1950 to plaintiff’s assignor, August Holterhoff. In brief, the production of a moire pattern is effected by moistening the fabric in confined pattern areas, applying tension, drying the fabric while maintaining tension, folding the fabric double and applying heat and pressure. Defendant at this juncture moves to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff has violated the antitrust laws and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Trenton Potteries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Newburgh Moire Company, Inc. v. Superior Moire Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Newburgh Moire Company, Inc. v. Superior Moire Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Newburgh Moire Co. v. Superior Moire Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1955